Robot Companion AI aims to correct material factual errors promptly and transparently. Readers, researchers, manufacturers and retailers may submit documented corrections without receiving control over editorial conclusions.
1. How to submit a correction
Use the Contact page or email contact@robotcompanion.online with “Correction” in the subject. A useful request includes:
- The article URL and exact statement in question.
- A concise explanation of what appears incorrect or incomplete.
- A reliable source supporting the proposed change.
- The date the source was accessed, especially for prices or product terms.
- Any relevant relationship to the product, company, study or dispute.
Do not send confidential customer records, passwords, payment details or unnecessary personal information.
2. How requests are reviewed
- 1
Locate the claim.
The editor confirms the published wording, surrounding context and source originally used.
- 2
Assess the evidence.
Primary documents, official support material, original research and stable public records are preferred.
- 3
Evaluate materiality.
The key question is whether the issue could change a reader’s understanding, safety, purchase decision or interpretation of evidence.
- 4
Choose an outcome.
The article may be corrected, clarified, updated, left unchanged with an explanation, or reviewed again when better evidence becomes available.
3. Types of editorial outcome
A factual statement was wrong
The inaccurate text is replaced or removed. A visible note may be added when the error was material.
The wording could mislead
Accurate information is rewritten or expanded so its scope, date, source or limitation is clearer.
The world changed after publication
A new price, product status, policy or study is incorporated without treating the original time-specific statement as an error.
4. Correction notes and modified dates
Material corrections should identify what changed and, where useful, the date of the change. Routine spelling, grammar, formatting, broken-link repairs and non-substantive wording improvements may be made without a separate correction note.
The modified date indicates that an article has changed; it does not mean every source or product term was rechecked on that date. High-change buying guides should state the date of important price or availability checks within the article.
5. What the policy does not guarantee
A correction request does not guarantee the requested wording, removal of a fair opinion or a favorable commercial conclusion. Disagreement with a verdict is not by itself evidence of factual error. Robot Companion AI may preserve relevant criticism, historical context and properly attributed claims.
Requests involving threats, impersonation, spam or attempts to obtain private information may not receive a response. Legal notices should clearly identify their basis and a reliable method of reply.
William Reeves is responsible for reviewing correction requests and deciding the final published wording. See the Author Profile and Sources & Review Methodology.